Could Abolishing the Seanád Damage Women’s opportunities to enter Irish Politics? #dail #seanad #seanref

It occurred to me this week that a referendum campaign is a lot like a sheep dog trial. You’ve got a sheep farmer with his collie dog herding a flock of sheep til eventually they’re all in the pen, as planned. They may have looked like they were at liberty to begin with, but by the end the farmer has them just where he wants them.

As part of a full and frank debate on such a serious constitutional issue as the upcoming referendum, here’s a thought; could abolishing the Seanád have an adverse affect on the opportunities for women to enter the male dominated world of Irish politics?

As I have mentioned before in a previous post, female participation statistics are woefully low in this country. As of September 2013 we languish in 89th position with Burkina Faso and the Republic of Korea with 15.7% female participation in our lower house (Dáil). However, as your eye is drawn across the table to the healthier but still not ideal figure of 30% female participation you will find under the title upper house (Seanate). See figures here.

Although some democratic countries do not have upper houses, as pointed out by campaigners for the abolishment of the Seanad, of the ones that do, in the figures, our 30% female participation figure in the Seanád means we lie in a respectable 16th position.

The abolishment of the Seanád will currently remove 18 women from Irish politics and who knows potentially how many in the future. The gender quota bill proposed after the last general election will force political parties to find female candidates or face cuts to their party funding, but will that be enough to remedy the political route offered by the Seanád? I would argue that the governments position on the Seanád demonstrates an inadequacy and incompetence in dealing with the issue of female participation in Irish politics that does not involve the predominantly supportive role of answering calls and mailouts.

You would be hard pressed to find anyone happy with the Seanád in its current form, but once it’s gone it’s gone, another route into Irish politics removed under the guise of cost savings.

The Government wants to remove the Seanád, that’s the plan; like the sheep farmer looking at his empty pen. The farmer sends out his collie dog to the sheep grazing on the hillside like the government sends out the PR and marketing campaigns to round-up the electorate.  However, the pedigree of this governments’ collie dog may be a little dubious this time around, as possibly inaccurate messages have been sent out to the electorate (Oireachtas: It’s not possible to estimate how much abolishing the Seanad would save – The and this mess they got themselves into this week with Swedish tennis star Bjorn Borg.

Superficial optics are the bane of Irish political life and electoral campaigns now, like a rabid collie scattering sheep everywhere; and I believe the reason why electoral turnout is suffering and will suffer, as the electorate becomes more disaffected.

The upcoming referendum will in all likely hood confirm this, and probably with a low turnout, sadly be passed. Whether you’ve 20 sheep or 3 sheep in the pen, they’re in the pen, and that’s all that matters.

Removing our upper house with a 30% female participation rate is a serious issue devoid of any analogy. Female participation in Irish politics will undoubtedly take a step backwards if the government succeeds with its plan. Our only hope is intelligent debate and failing that a rabid collie.

3 thoughts on “Could Abolishing the Seanád Damage Women’s opportunities to enter Irish Politics? #dail #seanad #seanref

  1. An interesting angle but surely the way to remedy the imbalance in the representation of women is to introduce mandatory quotas on all registered political parties via legislation by An Dáil? Retaining a fundamentally elitist and anti-democratic institution like Seanad Éireann is not the answer. It has proven itself indifferent to reform for decades and a defeat in the referendum would do little to change that. On the contrary it might well worsen the situation. Scrapping the Seanad and investing real power in all-party committees of An Dáil coupled with local government reform seems to me a better option.

    Of course, that’s if one can trust the Fine Oibre coalition to fulfil their promises (a big “if” admittedly).

      • On the untrustworthiness of FG and Labour I’d tend to agree but the hope would be that future governments might be pressurised into making real changes. As it is if we retain An Seanad then it is almost certain to be business as usual. And it might be that things would be worse if the political overclass believe that yet again they were getting away with it. If Seán and Síle Citizen don’t make their voices/anger/disgust known now when will they ever?

        I definitely agree that the lack of female representation is a major flaw in Ireland’s democracy. The lack of opportunities for women in politics means that more often than not only the worse of political operators, the Mary Harneys and Hildegarde Naughtons of this world, get through. I think we have all had enough crypto-Thatcherites to last a lifetime 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s